Customer
Owns product requirements, design rights, released files, essential acceptance behavior, and approvals unless another scope is agreed.
PCBLaunch helps overseas small hardware teams move from incomplete files, a board sample, or a prototype to a tested build and a reliable next order—through one accountable China-side project lead.
The process is intentionally simple. It creates a place for the decisions that otherwise disappear across supplier messages, file folders, and informal approvals.
Identify the board, revision, quantity, available files or physical samples, requested outcome, and the person responsible for decisions.
Check whether fabrication, assembly, sourcing, firmware, testing, and physical references agree. Record questions instead of filling gaps silently.
Agree which work is included, what must be approved, where a first article or prototype review is needed, and what evidence will decide the next step.
Match specialist engineers and suitable production partners to the released scope. Keep substitutions, issues, and decisions associated with the project revision.
Return the agreed boards, files, findings, and records. Identify whether the project is ready for repeat order, rework, redesign, or another prototype.
Every project follows the same visible chain. The details change; the responsibility does not.
Files, a board sample, a prototype, a BOM, photos, or simply a description of the outcome.
We identify the revision, quantity, constraints, rights, and the person who can approve decisions.
Missing data, obsolete parts, unclear tests, and supplier questions are recorded instead of guessed away.
You receive a practical plan for sourcing, assembly, prototype quantity, tests, hold points, and handover.
We match the released scope to the right specialists and production partners for the first build.
Findings, substitutions, rework, and unresolved items stay attached to the project revision.
Decisions are visible before the project moves from prototype evidence to a small batch.
Boards, files, findings, and records return with a clear recommendation: repeat, rework, redesign, or stop.
Responsibility can change by project, but it should never remain implied.
Owns product requirements, design rights, released files, essential acceptance behavior, and approvals unless another scope is agreed.
Coordinates review, specialists, suppliers, issue visibility, progress, and the handover defined for the project.
Perform agreed specialist, fabrication, sourcing, assembly, test, or rework tasks under the project scope.
The value is in the source files, approvals, observations, and decisions behind each status. PCBLaunch uses process records to make responsibility visible, not to simulate certainty.
PCBLaunch connects the work that factories usually separate: understanding the request, checking the package, selecting the right production route, resolving parts, building, testing, recording results, and preparing the next release.
Capture the customer goal, current evidence, missing information, quantity, and acceptance boundary.
Choose the right specialist and supplier, resolve sourcing, confirm the scope, and produce the first controlled build.
Test, record findings, approve revisions, release the next action, and keep the project ready for repeat production.
The process is designed for the space between an incomplete request and a repeatable build. Each gate narrows uncertainty before more time or money is committed.
Record the product goal, current files or board, quantity, timing and the result the first build must prove.
Expose gaps in design, sourcing, assembly, programming, test and logistics. Confirm what needs specialist input.
Build the smallest useful proof, record findings and surface changes instead of hiding rework in the schedule.
Confirm the accepted revision, open exceptions, quality record and the information needed for the next batch.
Yes. The first gate identifies what is known, what is missing and which missing item changes scope or risk.
The customer approves scope, material, test-limit and release decisions after the relevant specialist input is recorded.
No. A pilot proves defined questions. Release requires repeatable evidence, agreed exceptions and a stable package.
PCBLaunch will identify the next questions before a build scope is agreed.