Revision
Files, board samples, firmware references, and changes point to an identifiable version.
Quality is built from revision control, explicit technical questions, agreed checks, visible exceptions, and records that explain what happened.
PCBLaunch does not use an unsupported badge, factory image, or inspection name as a substitute for project evidence.
Files, board samples, firmware references, and changes point to an identifiable version.
Fabrication, assembly, sourcing, programming, testing, and records are stated rather than assumed.
Checks name the setup, condition, expected result, and actual observation where available.
Unresolved questions, deviations, rework, and limitations remain visible to the next decision.
The responsible person is identifiable when a substitution or change is accepted.
Included boards, files, findings, and records are agreed before completion.
ICT, flying probe, continuity checks, programmed functional checks, or another method can each answer different questions. The method name alone does not state coverage.
Project review defines what can be checked, what setup exists, what pass condition applies, and which product behavior remains outside the available test.
Use the prototype test-plan checklistQuality is not a badge or a dashboard color. It is the evidence behind the decisions: what was checked, under which condition, what changed, and what remains open.
Tie inspection, test, rework, and delivery evidence to the board and package that were actually released.
Do not hide substitutions, deviations, failed checks, or accepted limitations inside a supplier conversation.
Give the customer a usable record for approval, integration, shipment, and the next batch.
Inspection, test, rework, deviations, and delivery status are tied to a specific revision and condition. That makes the record useful to the customer, not just to the supplier.
A clear record includes accepted limitations and unresolved items. It does not turn an incomplete check into an unsupported quality claim.
Quality is not only the final inspection. It is the chain of evidence that lets a customer understand the build after it leaves the factory.
Record the board revision, received parts, supplied materials, visible condition and any mismatch before assembly starts.
Record substitutions, assembly findings, rework, programming changes and deviations while the decision is still recoverable.
State the setup, stimulus, expected result, actual result and disposition for the checks that matter to the project.
Leave the customer with accepted revision, open exceptions, retained records and the action needed for the next order.
No. A project record describes the checks and evidence for that build. It is not a substitute for a required certification or regulatory approval.
The failure, setup and disposition should be recorded. Rework or a scope change is approved rather than silently treated as a pass.
Yes. The accepted revision, changes and exceptions become practical inputs for a more repeatable next build.
PCBLaunch will identify the next questions before a build scope is agreed.